Dosage calculations & extract equivalency in herbal medicine

Compound Tincture of RhubarbOver a number of years of teaching, one of the common issues I’ve noticed is that students often find calculating dosage equivalents rather challenging. It is important to be able to convert between liquid extract quantities and dry herb amounts, and vice versa. So I thought this would be a good place to discuss the issues and provide some techniques to help.

Extraction vs Dry Herb

For hundreds of years extracts have been used in the administration of herbal medicines. In the earliest and simplest forms this usually involved infusions and decoctions, however as tools and methods have developed over the centuries, far more complicated and sophisticated methods are available and commonly used today.

However for lack of a better measure, the most commonly used dosage standard is weight of dry herb material. This is used in most historical and modern texts, where you will see dosage statements such as …

2-4g of dry root or equivalent, three times daily.

The interesting and most important phrase in here is “or equivalent”.


Equivalency implies that another preparation form or extract of a herb is suitable, provided it is deemed to be “equivalent” to this dosage of dry plant material.

By definition an extract removes something and leaves behind something else. Extraction thus changes the chemical profile when compared to the dry herb itself. Many factors can determine the chemistry of the final extract including:

  • solvent (menstruum) – eg. polar or non-polar, or combinations of different solvents
  • duration of maceration of dry material
  • physical size of dry material being macerated
  • method used to extract (eg. percolation, or simple maceration only)
  • concentration steps employed (eg. none, heat, low pressure)
  • and of course the quality of the raw material being extracted.

Therefore in the truest sense an extract can never be completely “equivalent” to the dry plant material, regardless of how it is produced. Nevertheless this concept of equivalency is still used widely (indeed it is included as a concept in the Australian Therapeutics Goods Regulations) due largely to the common desire to employ mostly Galenical extracts.

Galenical Extracts & Selective Extracts

A general principle of herbal medicine is that the activity of the medicine is due to a combination of active chemicals in the plant or the extract. Thus in most cases it is desirable to create an extract which most closely represents the chemical complexity of the dry plant material. Such extracts are often termed “Galenical extracts”, and more recently “full-spectrum extracts”.

However extracts which are not really comparable to the chemistry of dry herb are sometimes used in herbal medicine, in particular in tableting. These extracts are often called “Selective extracts” as their production methods have selectively removed one or more chemicals to a high degree, at the expense of other chemicals. Sometimes so-called “standardised extracts” are in reality selective extracts, as the Australian regulatory definition for standardisation is somewhat loose.

The merits of Galenical and Selective extracts are debated at length in herbal medicine, and are beyond the scope of this document. Suffice to say that general or blanket statements on this issue are usually flawed, and choice of extract can be very dependant upon the desired outcome of the medicine. For example, a selective standardised extract of Silybum marianum has been demonstrated to have excellent efficacy in severe hepatic damage, and also very good safety, making it a useful clinical choice. However in many other cases selective extracts may offer no additional – or even reduced – therapeutic benefit.

Extraction Strength (Drug Extract Ratio)

The strength of herbal extracts are generally expressed as a ratio of dry plant material to final extract quantity, also known as the drug extract ratio (DER). It is expressed in the following format:

X : Y

X = weight of dry plant material

Y = weight or volume of extract (depending upon whether extract is a solid/dry extract, or a liquid extract)

The concept here is that the essential activity of the dry plant material (X) is found in the quantity of extract (Y). Or in other words, Y quantity of the extract is equivalent to X quantity of the dry plant.

Remember that ratios are fractions – ie. a 1:2 is the same as ½, a 1:3 is the same as 1/3 and a concentrated 4:1 is equivalent to 4.

DER Dry Herb Weight Extract Weight or Volume Extract Description
1:1 1kg 1L liquid extract (also by convention 1:1’s are known as a fluid extracts)
1:2 1kg 2L liquid extract
1:3 1kg 3L liquid extract
1:5 1kg 5L liquid extract; 1:5’s and below are often termed tinctures, although this is technically more determined by method of extraction than actual DER (i.e. technically tinctures are produced only through maceration)
1:10 1kg 10L liquid extract; tincture
2:1 2kg 1L concentrated liquid extract
4:1 4kg 1kg semi-solid extract – hence the change to using weight as a measurement of extract quantity rather than volume
8:1 8kg 1kg solid or semi-solid extract (depending upon consistency)
25:1 25kg 1kg solid extract
8-9:1 8-9kg 1kg solid or semi-solid extract; when extracts from different batches are combined to obtain specific outcomes (eg. standardisation or quantification of specific phytochemicals in the final product), sometimes a range is used as the extract ratio; this can make dosage calculations based on dry herb quantities difficult


Extract Equivalency & Dosage Calculations

With multiple dosage forms now being common in herbal medicine, it is essential that clinicians can convert between extract and dry herb equivalency, and vice-versa. This process is very simple, and it is essential that all herbal students and clinicians can do these conversions quickly and accurately.

For instance, need to be able to interconvert between …

  • an Echinacea tablet stated to contain 200mg of a 4:1 extract, with a dose of 1 tablet three times daily
  • an Echinacea purpurea radix liquid extract stated to be a 1:2
  • a textbook recommended dose for Echinacea purpurea radix of 1-2g three times daily

So let’s look first at some rules to help you make these conversions.

1) Converting from dry herb to extract (DIVIDE)

An example of this would be:

“You have a 1:3 extract and need to give 1.5g of dry herb equivalent. What dose of the 1:3 extract should you use?”

X (dry herb quantity) = 1.5g
Y (extract quantity) = unknown
Extract ratio: 1:3 (or 1/3)

Rule: Divide the dry weight by the extract ratio

1.5g divided by 1/3 = 4.5mL

Therefore the answer is 4.5mL

2) Converting from extract to dry herb (MULTIPLY)

An example of this would be:

“You have 2mL of 1:3 extract, what is the equivalent quantity of dry herb?”

X (dry herb quantity) = unknown
Y (extract quantity) = 2mL
Extract ratio: 1:3 (or 1/3)

Rule: Multiply the extract quantity by the extract ratio

2mL multiplied by 1/3 = 0.66g

Therefore the answer is 0.66g

3) Don’t Get Your Units Messed Up!

It is essential that you keep your units correct throughout your calculations. When you look at the table given on page 2, you see that a 1:2 extract is said to be 1kg : 2L. This is the same as:

1000g : 2000mL (because there are 1000g in 1kg and 1000mL in 1L)
1g : 2mL
1000mg : 2mL
500mg : 1mL

Some Examples

Here are some examples of applying the methods discussed above.

1) What is the dry herb equivalent of 2mL of a 1:2 extract?

This is an “extract to dry herb” question, so we multiply by the extraction ratio.

2mL multiplied by 1/2 = 1g

Therefore the answer is 1g

2) What is the 1:5 liquid equivalent of 3g of dry herb?

This is a “dry herb to extract” question, so we divide by the extraction ratio.

3g divided by 1/5 = 15mL

Therefore the answer is 15mL

3) What is the dry herb equivalent of 150mg of an 8:1 extract?

This is an “extract to dry herb” question, so we multiply by the extraction ratio. But remember that we need to keep our units the same!

150mg multiplied by 8/1 = 1200mg

Therefore the answer is 1200mg (or 1.2g)


  1. Reply


    September 20, 2014

    Ian, you've addressed this issue with real finesse. Of course, there are several threads to the more complete topic of crude herb to liquid dosage conversion that you did not address in your article (e.g. fresh versus dry and drop dosage calculations). But, what is addressed, is framed splendidly.

    As you point out, all extraction is selective. Even if we extract all soluble constituents, at the very least we are leaving behind the spent marc, which may in itself provide benefit, if we were to consume the plant as part of a plant-based diet. For what it's worth...the way I see it, there are 3 common motives behind employing purposefully selective extraction. First, in commerce, selective extraction may be driven by some effort to increase profitability, by maximizing the yield of a compound being characterized for so-called 'standardization'. As a manufacturer, if I use a solvent composition and extraction methodology that yields an increase of a plant's biomarker compound(s) by 10%, then I can use 10% less of that extract in my finished product...and still meet the label claim for the biomarker(s). Secondly, it may actually be advantageous when using some of the so-called 'toxic botanicals' - that have a narrower TI - to know precisely how much of a marker compound is in each dose. Finally, selective extraction can be employed to produce an extract tailored for a specific therapeutic outcome. Taking Podophyllum for example - according to the Eclectics, if extracted with ethanol, you yield the plant's resins, which are highly cathartic. Conversely, extract Podophyllum with hot water and you yield more of the lectins, which are considered to be highly alterative. So, are you extracting Podophyllum to provide a laxative or a 'blood purifying' effect? The answer will determine what you selectively extract.

    • Reply

      Ian Breakspear

      September 21, 2014

      Hi Shayne!

      Thanks for your comments, and I thoroughly agree with what you've said about selective extraction. Everything from the solvents used, duration of maceration/percolation, temperature of the maceration, all can play a significant role in altering the final chemistry of the extract, and thus the reality of the term "equivalency".

      Extending upon your statement re maximising the yield of a specific constituent in making a "standardised" product, sometimes a similar process is used with poor quality raw material to reach the desired "standardisation specification". Which is obviously a shame in the context of holistic phytochemistry.

      I think it is important that practitioner awareness of some of the issues is increased, because at the end of the day, clinical effectiveness is intimately linked with the quality of the medicines we use. And each and every one of our patients deserves the best medicine we can give them.

  2. Reply


    November 2, 2018

    Very helpful information. Thank you.
    I am a little confused..
    I have 1000 kg Nettle (for example) and I want to make liquid extract from it, the ratio will be 1:4
    So,what should be the quantity ot obtained liquid extract? 4000kg or am I wrong?

    • Reply

      Ian Breakspear

      November 4, 2018

      Hi Maya!
      Thanks for your comments.
      Yes, essentially your calculations are correct. If you have 1000kg of dry herb material, and desire to make a 1:4, then the quantity of final liquid will be 4000L (because it is a liquid extract, we generally measure the output in volume rather than mass/weight). Obviously though that would be a HUGE batch! ;-)

  3. Reply


    November 5, 2018

    Thank you so much, Mr. Breakspear :-)
    What about dry extracts? There is other calculation or it is the same? (If I have 1000 kg raw material) I will get 4000L liquid extract but if I want dry extract, I should evaporate the solvent and what is the ratio there?

    • Reply

      Ian Breakspear

      November 5, 2018

      Hi Maya,

      Pleasure! With dry extracts the principles are the same, however if the extract is a solid or semi-solid, then the final extract mass (instead of volume) is used in the ratio. As an example, say you have 10kg of dry herbal material, and you extract it using whatever choice of solvents, then evaporate the liquid until you have 2kg of dry extract, you would have a 10:2 (i.e. 10kg of dry material, producing 2kg of extract), or as it would usually be written, a 5:1 (i.e. 5kg producing 1 kg).

      Of course the concentration step is a major confounding factor in the actual activity - whilst you might have a 5:1 mathematically, the real question is do you actually have an extract that is 5 times stronger than the original dry material? Whilst obviously the choice of solvent and method of extraction plays a role here, the concentration step adds another factor, and the outcome is largely dependent upon the active chemistry of the plant. For example, if the actives are volatile, then using heat and/or vacuum concentration will result in not just the solvent being removed, but also a large proportion of the actives. Likewise if the actives are unstable at higher temperatures, then you have to be very careful to ensure that those temperatures are not reached otherwise the constituents will degrade.

      It is for these reasons that many of the concentrates sold on the world herbal materials market and incorporated into powders and tablets and capsule, often don't work in clinical practice as well as you'd expect. Many clinicians don't realise this, and companies rarely discuss this issue openly. Of course there are exceptions (often where the company has invested considerable money and time into research and development, including benchtop and clinical research) but overall these are the exceptions, rather than the rule.

  4. Reply


    November 14, 2018

    Hi Mr. Breakspear, please help me with an argument regardind the follwings: I have two extracts, an 10:1 extract and an 5:1 extract from which I obtain the same mass of solid extract, let's say, 5g of solid extract. In terms of comparison, could I say that the 10:1 ratio is more concentrated than the other, just because I use more herb? Taking into account that the final extract quantity is the same, I would actually presume that the 5:1 extract is obtained from a herb of a higher quality, rather than say that the first one is more concentrated.
    Thank you very much and I am looking forward for your opinion!

    • Reply

      Ian Breakspear

      November 16, 2018

      Hi Joanna!
      Yes, the 10:1 is definitely more concentrated than the 5:1 - if you have 5g of a 10:1 extract, then it is equivalent to 50g of dry herb, whereas 5g of a 5:1 would be equivalent to 25g of dry herb.

      However it is important to know this is a simple mathematical relationship - it does not take into account the raw material quality, or the efficiency of the extraction. It is certainly possible to have 5g of a 5:1 made efficiently from good raw material, which is more efficacious than 5g of a 10:1 made with less-than-ideal solvents and methodology and poor quality raw material.

      This is why dry herb equivalency calculations are important, but cannot always be relied upon when comparing products. It is also why many herbalists find better results from 1:1 or 1:2 liquid extracts than some tablets, even when using the same dry herb equivalent amount. It is not because of better absorption, but because in creating the concentrate to go in the tablet, the desired phytochemical profile has been sacrificed in order to get a more impressive looking drug extract ratio.

Would you like to share your thoughts?

Would you like to share your thoughts?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Copyright Ian Breakspear, 2014